Legal Opinion

Sidle v. Humphrey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1968No. 40796PublishedCited by 322 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

Both sides apparently concede that Mark was a business invitee of the defendant’s tenants. The only cause of Mark’s fall alleged in the pleadings or indicated by the evidence was the natural accumulation of ice and snow on the steps and on the porch at the top of those steps.

Paragraph two of the syllabus in Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 38, 227 N. E. 2d 603, reads:

“The mere fact standing alone that the owner or occupier has failed to remove the natural accumulations of snow and ice from private walks on his business premises for an unreasonable time does not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Oswald v. JerajOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Turoff v. RichmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Wise v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Levine v. Hart Motors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by322 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Brinkman v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1993

317 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API