Legal Opinion

Maryland National Bank v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 15, 1993No. 65, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

This case concerns the duty of a bank under Maryland Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol.), § 11-603 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, to impound funds held in a joint account of a husband and wife when an attachment is laid in its hands by a judgment creditor of the husband only. At the time the garnishment was initiated, § 11-603, which was enacted by Ch. 818 of the Acts of 1989, provided:

“(a) Spousal property.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a garnishment against property held jointly by husband and wife, in a bank, trust company, credit…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Milholland v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  5. Taxiera v. MalkusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Outmezguine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. In Re Wallace W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Comptroller of the Treasury v. JamesonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Cooper v. BikleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API