Maryland National Bank v. Pearce
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
This case concerns the duty of a bank under Maryland Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol.), § 11-603 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, to impound funds held in a joint account of a husband and wife when an attachment is laid in its hands by a judgment creditor of the husband only. At the time the garnishment was initiated, § 11-603, which was enacted by Ch. 818 of the Acts of 1989, provided:
“(a) Spousal property.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a garnishment against property held jointly by husband and wife, in a bank, trust company, credit…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Milholland v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Taxiera v. MalkusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Outmezguine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- In Re Wallace W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. JamesonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Cooper v. BikleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.