Legal Opinion

Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 5, 1994No. 105, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

Maryland Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol. & 1993 Cum.Supp.) § 5-108(a) 1 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article provides that no cause of action for personal injury resulting from the defective and unsafe condition of an improvement to real property accrues if the injury occurs more than 20 years after the date the entire improvement first became available for its intended use. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant manufacturer on the ground that § 5-108(a) barred the plaintiffs suit: This appeal followed.

We issued a writ…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Blackstone v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Sharon Gill, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Gale Gill v. Evansville Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API