In Re Wallace W.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
Appellant Wallace W. contends that Maryland’s unauthorized use statute is inapplicable to the taking of a purse. See Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol., 1993 Cum.Supp.), Article 27, § 349. 1 Wallace argues that the statute’s coverage is limited to livestock, boats, and vehicles, and thus does not extend to purses. We agree with Appellant’s contention and, for the . reasons discussed below, reverse the finding that he committed a delinquent act.
I
On May 20, 1992, a juvenile hearing was held to determine whether Appellant committed a delinquent act. See Md.Code (1974, 1989…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Management Personnel Services, Inc. v. SandefurCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- United States v. StreidelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Lee-Thomas v. Prince George's County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. PaganoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Tribbitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.