Legal Opinion

In Re Wallace W.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 20, 1993No. 54, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

Appellant Wallace W. contends that Maryland’s unauthorized use statute is inapplicable to the taking of a purse. See Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl.Vol., 1993 Cum.Supp.), Article 27, § 349. 1 Wallace argues that the statute’s coverage is limited to livestock, boats, and vehicles, and thus does not extend to purses. We agree with Appellant’s contention and, for the . reasons discussed below, reverse the finding that he committed a delinquent act.

I

On May 20, 1992, a juvenile hearing was held to determine whether Appellant committed a delinquent act. See Md.Code (1974, 1989…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Management Personnel Services, Inc. v. SandefurCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. United States v. StreidelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Lee-Thomas v. Prince George's County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  2. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. State v. PaganoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Tribbitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API