Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Bikle

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 11, 1994No. 128, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

Susanne E. Cooper and Richard A. Bikle are the eo-personal representatives of the Estate of Helen Virginia Bikle. In that capacity, they brought a tort action against Josef F. Bikle for fraud, conversion and conspiracy. 1 The plaintiffs complaint alleged that Josef Bikle and the now-deceased Austin H. Bikle, who was Helen Virginia Bikle’s husband, fraudulently converted approximately $70,000.00 from certain joint accounts held by Austin and Helen Bikle. Josef Bikle denied these allegations, and sought to have the action dismissed for failure to join the Estate of Austin H.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lynch v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Sharrow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Milholland v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  4. Birney v. Smith (In Re Birney)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Saint James Apt. Partners v. Univeral Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API