Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. UNITED LIFE & ACC. INS. CO., CONCORD, NH

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1958No. 239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsoN, J.

Conceding, without deciding, that the plaintiff’s evidence in some aspects is sufficient to show prima facie that the insured met his death through accidental means within the insuring provisions of the policies, even so, the evidence discloses conclusively that the insured met his death by homicide as the result of being struck by Dr. Black. True, it may be inferred that Dr. Black was incited to action by the insulting language of the insured and that in striking the blow he had no intent to kill. Nevertheless, the rule is that no words, however violent or insulting, justify a blow. Lewis v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Lewis v. . FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Hedgecock v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. State v. HovisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Thomas-Yelverton Co. v. State Capital Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Mills v. State Life and Health Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Tayloe v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Barnes v. Home Beneficial Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API