State v. Hovis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbe single question presented for decision is tbe sufficiency of tbe evidence to overcome tbe demurrer and to withstand tbe motion for a directed verdict. Tbe rulings of tbe trial court were favorable to tbe State, and we are disposed to approve.
It is true tbe evidence is not all one way and it was offered by tbe prosecution — the defendant electing not to go upon tbe witness stand or to offer any evidence — nevertheless it is tbe rule with us that on demurrer to tbe evidence or motion for directed verdict tbe State is entitled to have tbe evidence considered in its most favorable light,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . StansellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.