Legal Opinion

Thomas-Yelverton Co. v. State Capital Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1953No. 97PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The sole question presented for decision on this appeal is whether or not the court below committed error in sustaining the defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

Ordinarily in an action to recover on a life insurance policy, where the execution and delivery of the policy and the subsequent death of the insured are proven or admitted, and the premiums have been paid, the burden of establishing an affirmative defense rests upon the insurer. Strigas v. Insurance Co., 236 N.C. 734, 73 S.E. 2d 788; Tolbert v. Insurance Co., 236 N.C. 416, 72 S.E. 2d 915; MacClure v. Casualty Co., 229 N.C.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gardner v. North State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bryant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Fishblate v. Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Kubit v. MAG Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. DillardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Jones v. Home Security Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Potter v. Carolina Water CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API