Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Home Beneficial Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 24, 1967No. 194PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

In insurance policies' which provide for payment, not merely for death, but death by accident or by external, violent, and accidental means, the authorities support the general rule that the burden is on the plaintiff to show that the death of insured resulted from accident or accidental means within the terms of the policy. Chesson v. Insurance Co., 268 N.C. 98, 150 S.E. 2d 40; Horn v. Insurance Co., 265 N.C. 157, 143 S.E. 2d 70; 29A Am. Jur., Insurance §§ 1852, 1957 (1960); 46 C.J.S., Insurance § 1317(2) (1946); Annot., 12 A.L.R. 2d 1264, 1268-69 (1950); Annot., 144 A.L.R. 1416, 1422…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Warren v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Slaughter v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Warren v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Chesson v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Company v. HumeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Moore v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Linder v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. McNeil v. Pilot Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Blythe v. Kanawha InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API