Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1980No. 7912SC1106PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendants’ principal assignment of error is directed to the court’s refusal to grant their motions for dismissal at the close of all the evidence. Their argument is centered on the lack of a showing that the assault by defendants was a proximate cause of Melvin’s death.

*683As always, upon a motion to dismiss, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state and allow the state every reasonable inference that may arise upon the evidence, regardless of whether it is circumstantial, direct, or both. Contradictions and discrepancies are for the jury to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. HargettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API