Jarman v. Offutt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
For the purpose of decision, it may be conceded tbat ordinarily the publication of written words imputing insanity or impairment of mental faculties is libelous per se. 33 Am. Jur., Libel and Slander, Sec. 51; Annotation: 66 A.L.E. 1257. Also, for the purpose of decision it may be conceded that, nothing else appearing, a defamatory communication made to a relative of the defamed person is actionable. See Annotation: 25 A.L.R. 2d 1388.
In the case at hand the defendant places chief stress on the contention that the alleged defamatory statement was made in a judicial proceeding, and that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ramsey v. . CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Hedgecock v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Thomas-Yelverton Co. v. State Capital Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Harshaw v. . HarshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Corcoran v. JerrelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Holmes v. EddyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.