McManus v. Donlin

Appellant plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to a new trial on the following grounds:(1) The trial court erred in granting a nonsuit because there was sufficient evidence in the record to raise a jury issue with respect to both defendants being guilty of malpractice.(2) The trial court erred in refusing to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.(3) The trial court committed prejudicial error in certain of its rulings on evidence.

In passing on the first of these contentions we will consider separately, the evidence relating to each defendant which plaintiffs claim required the trial…