Legal Opinion

Skodje v. Hardy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1955No. 33270PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, C. J.

This malpractice case was tried to a jury and dismissed at the close of plaintiffs’ case. The sole question presented on appeal is whether plaintiffs produced substantial evidence of actionable negligence.

Obert Skodje, suffering from abdominal pains, went to Dr. Hardy on July 1, 1953, for diagnosis and treatment. He told Dr. Hardy that he believed he had appendicitis. The doctor spent twenty or twenty-five minutes examining the patient, including palpation of the abdomen. A urine specimen was taken, but Dr. Hardy did not take the patient’s pulse, temperature, blood count, or blood pressure.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fritz v. HorsfallWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Peddicord v. LieserWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Woods v. PommereningWashington Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Keogan v. Holy Family HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dabroe v. Rhodes Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Gonzales v. SansoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. RankinWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Fisher v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API