Legal Opinion

Weihert v. Piccione

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1956PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

The learned trial court granted the defendant’s motions for nonsuit on the ground that sufficient evidence had not been introduced at the trial to support the averments of the complaints. The challenge here is to such ruling.

A motion for a nonsuit is equivalent to a demurrer to the evidence. In passing upon such motion, it is incumbent upon the court to view the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, and the court must give the plaintiff the benefit of the most favorable inferences that can reasonably be deduced therefrom. Lake Mills v. Veldhuizen (1953), 263 Wis. 49, 56 N. W.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. ConiglioNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Emerson v. Riverview Rink & BallroomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of Lake Mills v. VeldhuizenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Coca v. ArceoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Olson v. RatzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  5. Radloff v. National Food Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API