City of Cedarburg Light & Water Commission v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
This appeal involves a jury’s findings which have been sustained by the trial court. Upon review in this court we are committed to the rule that the judgment must be upheld if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view admits of an inference supporting the verdict. Burlison v. Janssen (1966), 30 Wis. (2d) 495, 141 N. W. (2d) 274; Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. (1965), 28 Wis. (2d) 249, 137 N. W. (2d) 6. Our search is only for evidence supporting the jury’s findings. Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co. (1954), 266 Wis. 106, 62 N. W. (2d) 549, 63 N. W. (2d)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Diemel v. WeirichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Royal Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Spleas v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Cramer v. Theda Clark Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Industrial Risk Insurers & Quad Graphics, Inc. v. American Engineering Testing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Netzel v. State Sand & Gravel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.