Kuehnemann v. Boyd
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Physicians and surgeons: Malpractice: Degree of skill required: Experttestimony: Patient burned by X-ray treatments: Doctrine of res ipsaloquitur not applicable.
1. In an action by a patient against a physician for malpractice causing an X-ray burn, the burden is on the patient to prove negligence by the physician in administering the X-ray treatments. p. 591.
2. Evidence that a treatment by a machine using two filters did not produce a burn, while a subsequent treatment with one filter removed did produce one, did not prove that the dosage with one filter removed was an overdosage, or that a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Runyan v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Stemons v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Shier v. FreedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Nowatske v. OsterlohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.