Shier v. Freedman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The most important issue before us in this case is whether the “locality rule” in medical malpractices in Wisconsin should be abrogated both as to general practitioners and specialists.
For over eighty years Wisconsin has followed the locality rule. Gates v. Fleischer (1886), 67 Wis. 504, 30 N. W. 674. One of the most accurate statements of the rule was pronounced in Burnside v. Evangelical Deaconess Hospital (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 519, 175 N. W. 2d 230. This court stated at pages 522, 523:
“When a physician exercises that degree of care, judgment, and skill which physicians in good standing of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Douglas v. BussabargerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Small v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Gates v. FleischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Hall v. HilbunMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. GoffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.