Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Mancuso

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 18, 1990No. 8889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCretella, J.

The defendant in this contract action appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that the plaintiff proved fraud in the inducement of the contract by clear and convincing evidence, (2) rendered judgment for the plaintiff in violation of public policy, (3) denied his motion to dismiss at the close of the plaintiff’s case, and (4) rendered judgment beyond the relief sought in the plaintiff’s complaint. The plaintiff cross appeals claiming that the court improperly ordered that the defendant is entitled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  2. Chomko v. PatmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Northeast Gunite & Grouting Corp. v. ChapmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. State v. ChauvinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Muller v. WitteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Vezina v. Nautilus Pools, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. In Re Colonial Ltd. Partnership LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  5. Biro v. MatzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API