Legal Opinion

Muller v. Witte

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 26, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action for money alleged to have been loaned by a wife to her husband, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County, Coats, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff Henrietta S. Witte.

1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, C. J.

This action was brought at first by the plaintiff Muller alone, upon the common counts. He claimed to be the bona fide owner by assignment from Henrietta S. Witte, who was in fact the wife of the defendant, of a 'debt alleged to be due from the defendant to his said wife. Subsequently, upon the motion of said Muller, said Henrietta was made a 'coplaintiff in the action. The bill of particulars as filed in the case was for money loaned to, and paid out for, the defendant by his said wife.

After this the plaintiffs filed an additional count, alleging in substance these facts: That Henrietta was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baxter v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  2. Moore v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  3. Bixby v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Emerson v. Western Seed & Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Freebourn v. Merchants' Credit Service, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dorsey v. MancusoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Evans v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BernblumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API