Legal Opinion

Chomko v. Patmon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 29, 1989No. 7267PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court for the defendants in this summary process action. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred (1) in failing to find that a landlord and tenant relationship existed, (2) in failing to find a tenancy at sufferance, (3) in failing to draw an adverse inference because a defendant did not testify, and (4) in finding sufficient credible evidence to support the defendants’ claim. We find no error.

The facts giving rise to this claim are as follows. On March 1, 1982, the parties executed a “Contract for Sale”1 providing for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Welk v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Vezina v. Nautilus Pools, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Dorsey v. MancusoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API