Anderson v. Palladine
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this action plaintiff sought and secured a judgment quieting his title to two quarter-sections of timber land situated in the county of Fresno. The record before us shows only the answer and appeal of the defendant ITumeBennett Lumber Company, Incorporated.
The corporation appellant made no claim to the land in suit as distinguished from the timber growing thereon, but its answer, in addition to denying all of the material allegations of the complaint, pleaded several special defenses, only one of which, however, is involved upon this appeal, namely: That defense which interposed the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Ciapusci v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Drewry v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Pedro v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Ah Pah Redwood Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
- McCreary v. Mercury Lumber DistributorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Crain v. HoeflingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.