Legal Opinion

Crain v. Hoefling

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1942No. Civ. 6694PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. On February 11, 1885, Big Bend Tunnel and Mining Company owned the S.E. % of Section 1, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., M.D.B. & M. in Butte County, California, hereinafter referred to as Parcel 2. David W. Hall owned the S.W. yá of Section 6, T. 21 N., R. 5 E., M.D.B. & M., hereinafter referred to as Parcel 1. Said parcels adjoin. The Tunnel Company on said date entered into an agreement with Hall by which it remised, released and forever quit-claimed unto Hall and his brother, their heirs and assigns “the sole right and privilege to use and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Watson v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Franke v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. M. & I. TIMBER CO. v. Hope Silver-Lead Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cushing v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API