Crain v. Hoefling
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. On February 11, 1885, Big Bend Tunnel and Mining Company owned the S.E. % of Section 1, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., M.D.B. & M. in Butte County, California, hereinafter referred to as Parcel 2. David W. Hall owned the S.W. yá of Section 6, T. 21 N., R. 5 E., M.D.B. & M., hereinafter referred to as Parcel 1. Said parcels adjoin. The Tunnel Company on said date entered into an agreement with Hall by which it remised, released and forever quit-claimed unto Hall and his brother, their heirs and assigns “the sole right and privilege to use and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Watson v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Franke v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- M. & I. TIMBER CO. v. Hope Silver-Lead Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Cushing v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.