Legal Opinion

United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1914No. L.A. No. 3001PublishedCited by 60 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Lewis W. Andrews, Thos. O. Toland, and Cedric E. Johnson, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was brought to recover the unpaid part of the purchase price of a dredge constructed by plaintiff for defendant. Defendant needed a dredge to deepen a portion of the harbor of San Pedro in aid of its dock and wharf business. The purpose for which the dredge was to be used and the place where it was to be used were well understood by the parties. Plaintiff had in a letter designated “D” made an offer to construct dredges of different capacity and design for different prices. This letter concluded with the following statement: “We have looked at your grounds and have designed you a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Salstrom v. Orleans Bar Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bancroft v. San Francisco Tool Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. California Electric Works, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API