Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1991No. 3-90-154-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWERS, Justice.

In a statutory-condemnation action, the State of Texas and the City of Austin recovered title to a small part of a tract of land owned by Robert M. Schmidt and Richard A. Massman. The trial-court judgment awarded Schmidt and Massman a sum equal to the stipulated market value of the part taken ($7,559.00) plus the depreciation in value of the remainder as found by the jury ($74,880.00). Tex.Prop.Code Ann. § 21.042(b), (c) (1984). The State and the City appeal. We will affirm the judgment.

We refer hereafter to the litigants as Schmidt and the City, omitting any mention of the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. DuPuy v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. City of Austin v. TeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1978

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BiggarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. BP America Production Co. v. Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  4. Weingarten Realty Investors v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  5. State v. Munday EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API