Legal Opinion
State v. Munday Enterprises
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 11, 1992No. 3-90-236-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIDD, Justice.
Appellants, the State of Texas and City of Austin (collectively, the “State”), appeal from a jury verdict and trial-court judg*645ment in favor of appellee, Munday Enterprises (“Munday”).1
THE CONTROVERSY
This is another in a series of condemnation actions by the State to obtain property for the widening of U.S. Highway 183 within the city limits of Austin, Texas. This condemnation proceeding concerned a 1.65-acre taking out of a 15.84-acre tract owned by condemnee, Munday. The project in question involves the conversion of U.S. Highway 183 to a controlled-access highway. To eliminate…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Pearland v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MoruaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Munday EnterprisesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Johnson v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1993
- Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.