Legal Opinion
City of Austin v. Teague
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1978No. B-7197PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Joe M. Teague, Adon Sitra and Cecil Ruby Company, Inc. sued the City of Austin for damages for inverse condemnation of eight and one-half acres of land bordering South Interregional Highway 35 in Austin, Texas. They asked also for an order commanding the City to issue a Water Development Permit required by the City’s Creek Ordinance. After a jury trial the court ordered the City to issue the requested permit and rendered judgment for $109,939 for a taking and damaging of the property for the period from June 26,1975, to November 1,1976. The City obeyed the order to issue the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Steele v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- SHEFFIELD DEVEL. CO. INC. v. City of Glenn HeightsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.