Legal Opinion

Keilbach v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1945No. Appeals, 116 and 117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

These appeals are brought by the defendants from the judgments rendered against them in two actions of assumpsit on insurance policies. Plaintiff brought one action on the double indemnity provision of a life insurance policy and the other on a policy of accident insurance. The same issue was involved in both cases, viz., whether plaintiff’s decedent died as a result of an accident or from natural causes. The cases were tried together and separate verdicts and judgments were entered in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal, the cases were argued together and Will be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Pomorskie v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Lederer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Lubowicki v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Gyulai v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whistler Sportswear, Inc. v. RulloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Murray v. SiegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Med-Mar, Inc. v. DILWORTHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API