Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 27, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2365 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
The Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO or Company) appeals an August 27, 1982 order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC or Commission) which in part required PECO to notify the Commission of the Company’s decision either to .suspend or cancel construction at the Limerick Unit 2 Nuclear Generating Plant. This Opinion is in support of the *426Per Curiam Order of this Court, dated December 16, 1982, which reversed those portions of the appealed order.1
Procedural History
In August 1980, the Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate filed2 a petition requesting the PUC…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Swarthmore Borough v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Park Towne & Madway Engineers & Constructors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Pennsylvania Pub. Util. v. Phil. Elec.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983