Legal Opinion

Gyulai v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1938No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The plaintiff below and appellee herein sued to recover from the defendant insurance company the additional “Accidental Death Benefit” of $1,000 it had agreed by its insurance contract upon the life of her husband, Vincent Gyulai, to pay “upon receipt of due proof” that his death, which occurred on October 5, 1936, “resulted” from a “bodily injury” sustained, within the preceding ninety days, “solely through external, violent and accidental means.” The defense was that the insured’s death “resulted from disease or bodily infirmity.” The trial of this issue on January…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Hesse v. Traveler's Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. R. E. Tr. Co. of Phila. v. Met. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Real Estate Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Keilbach v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Mawn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Browarsky v. GrangerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API