Legal Opinion

Lederer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1938No. Appeal, 83PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

In its broad outlines, the question of law involved upon this appeal is whether the plaintiff below, appellant herein, would have been entitled to go to the jury even if a certified copy of a death certificate, issued under Section 21 of the Act of June 7, 1915, P. L. 900, as amended May 24, 1933, 35 PS §471, had been admitted in evidence at her instance.

The action below was upon a policy of insurance issued August 26, 1929, by the defendant company, in the sum of $500, upon the life of Judith Segal and naming her sister, Emma Lederer, the plaintiff, as the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Beglin v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. McKinstry v. CollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  5. Borgon v. John Hancock M. Life Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stroburg v. Insurance Company of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Lucas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Heffron v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Kubacki v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Skillman v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API