Murray v. Siegal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
This is a personal injury action wherein the court en banc below sustained the action of the trial court’s entry of a compulsory nonsuit. On appeal, the plaintiff questions the correctness of the judgment of non-suit and certain rulings by the trial court rejecting proffered evidence.
In assessing the propriety of the entry of the non-suit, certain fundamental legal principles must be kept in mind, namely, that such a judgment should be entered only in a clear case, and further, in reviewing the record, we must read the testimony in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Flagiello v. CrillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Paxos v. Jarka CorporationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.