Legal Opinion

Med-Mar, Inc. v. DILWORTH

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1969No. Appeal, 1004PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

The plaintiff, Med-Mar, Inc., filed suit in assumpsit February 10, 1964, seeking recovery of damages from its architect for defective construction of the roof of a building erected to house medical offices at Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania. At trial, defendant contractor Dilworth was removed from the case on motions and the trial proceeded against defendant architect Seidle alone.

The agreement with architect Seidle was oral and concerned, inter alia, the supervision of construction of the building in accordance with plans and specifications. Twenty-five (25%) percent of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Lewey v. H. C. Fricke Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Ciccarelli v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. The Gates Rubber Company, a Corporation v. Usm Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. Hussey v. May Department Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API