Legal Opinion

Sharrow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 15, 1986No. 111, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case involves allegations by an attorney that an insurance carrier has tortiously interfered with his contingent fee contract by settling a personal injury claim directly with the attorney’s client. -Determinative of the issue before us is the nature of the insurer’s conduct that must be alleged in order for such a claim to be actionable and whether the allegations of fact in the attorney’s complaint “state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” Md. Rule 2-322(b)(2).

I

On December 24,1983, Donald P. Zorbach was involved in an accident with an automobile insured by…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Gardiner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  4. Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Figueiredo-Torres v. NickelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API