Legal Opinion

Faya v. Almaraz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1993No. 143, 144, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

These companion cases present the important question whether a surgeon infected with the AIDS virus has a legal duty to inform patients of that condition before operating upon them and, failing that, whether a patient’s fear of having contracted the AIDS .virus from the infected surgeon constitutes a legally compensable injury where the patient has not shown HIV-positive status.

I

Central to an understanding of these cases are the nature of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and its relationship to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV or “the AIDS virus”). First…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Brzoska v. OlsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Hoffman v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Green v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API