Legal Opinion
Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 28, 1984No. 58, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
The plaintiffs here challenge the granting of the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in an action under the Maryland Antitrust Act, Maryland Code (1975, 1983 Repl. Vol.), §§ 11-201 through 11-213 of the Commercial Law Article. The plaintiffs are Natural Design, Inc. (trading as Baycraft), The Raintree Company, and the officers of both corporations. The defendants include the Village of Cross Keys, Inc., which operates a shopping center called “The Village Square,” the Rouse Company, which owns the Village of Cross Keys, Inc., 1 and The Store, Ltd., which rents retail…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Siegel Transfer, Inc. v. Carrier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.