Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. The facts, which involve the construction and application, of certain provisions of the Bankruptcy Act in regard to appeals of mutual claims of the bankrupt and the creditors, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
Defendant in error, Charles De Witt, trading as Charles De Witt & Company, plaintiff in the court below and hereinafter spoken of as the plaintiff, brought his action in the Superior Court of Baltimore City, Maryland, to recover of the Cumberland Glass' Manufacturing Company, hereinafter called the Glass Company, upon the ground that De Witt, having entered into a written contract with the Mallard Distilling Company of New *449York to supply them with certain lettered flasks, the Glass Company, with knowledge of that contract, by and through the medium of their agents, did visit the Mallard…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Libby v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- United States of America on Behalf of Its Agency Internal Revenue Service v. William H. Norton, Carrie W. Norton, F/k/a Carrie A. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.