Legal Opinion

Figueiredo-Torres v. Nickel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 21, 1991No. 16PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

Appellant Silvio Figueiredo-Torres (Torres) filed a complaint on March 2, 1989, in the Circuit Court for Montgom*646ery County, against Appellee Herbert J. Nickel (Nickel) seeking damages for negligence, gross negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and “outrage.” The complaint alleged the following facts: In July 1985, Torres and his wife sought the counsel of Nickel, a licensed psychologist, for the puipose of preserving and improving their marital relationship. Most of the therapy sessions with Nickel were joint sessions attended by both Torres and his wife;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hamilton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Sharrow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. B.N. v. K.KCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Bryant v. Better Business Bureau of Greater Maryland, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API