Ward v. Nance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Franicum, Judge.
1. The trial court did not err in overruling the general demurrer. Though various facts alleged in the petition are interwoven so as to make it difficult to determine whether the action is an ex contractu action for a breach of a warranty or one sounding in tort, the record reveals that there is no demurrer to the petition as being duplicitous. In light of such fact this court will construe the petition toward that theory which sets forth a cause of action. Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse &c. Co., 157 Ga. 434 (6, 7) (122 S. E. 327); King Hardware Co. v. Ennis, 39…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Gulf Refining Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Ludwig v. J. J. Newberry CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Gay v. HealanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Durham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Wallis v. OdomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- KING SALES COMPANY, INC. v. McKeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.