Sutton v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Presiding Judge.
1. “To sustain a conviction for a felony, the testimony corroborating that of the accomplice must be sufficient to connect the defendant with the perpetration of the crime and tend to show his participation therein. King v. State, 77 Ga. App. 539 (49 SE2d 196); Crowe v. State, 83 Ga. App. 325 (63 SE2d 682).” McPherson v. State, 96 Ga. App. 839 (101 SE2d 750); Smith v. State, 7 Ga. App. 781 (68 SE 335); Burge v. State, 103 Ga. App. 682 (2) (120 SE2d 200). Every act connected with the offense for which the defendant was on trial on a charge of procuring goods by means…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Burge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Ward v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- McPherson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geiger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Askew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Geiger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973