Legal Opinion

KING SALES COMPANY, INC. v. McKey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1961No. 38797PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

“A promise to do a certain thing for the benefit of the promisee, made to induce his entrance into a contract, the promisee earnestly believing that he would receive the benefits consequent upon the fulfillment of the promise, when at the time of making the promise there was no intention on the part of the promisor to fulfill it, but on the contrary the promise was made with intent not to fulfill it and was uttered as a mere scheme or device to defraud, is such a fraud as will void any contract induced thereby. A promise thus fraudulently made will authorize rescission of a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Price v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Vaughan v. OxenborgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Gilreath v. ArgoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. King Sales Co. v. BusterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. King Sales Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API