Legal Opinion

Gulf Refining Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1927No. 5746PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court, the deed and covenant now before us having been the subject of the adjudication in Smith v. Gulf Refining Co., 162 Ga. 191 (134 S. E. 446). At that time this court held that the recital “It is agreed with the parties hereto that the said J. E. Posey is to use the Standard Oil Co. gas and oil as long as the said G. C. Smith acts as agent for said' company and the prices of same are in accord with other gasoline and oils,” embodied in the deed from G. C. Smith to J. E. Posey, was a covenant running with the land, and not a mere personal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hood v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Rosen v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Morris-Forrester Oil Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Smith v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Stephen W. Brown Radiology Associates v. GowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. WhitlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API