Legal Opinion

Ludwig v. J. J. Newberry Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1949No. 32346PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Special ground 4 of the amended motion for a new trial contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial on motion of counsel for the defendant, based upon an alleged improper and prejudicial cross-examination of the plaintiff for the defendant, or upon overruling said motion for a .mistrial, thereupon failing by all needful and proper instructions to the jury, as requested by counsel for the plaintiff, to remove the improper impression from their minds. It is contended that, when the jury was selected to try the case, each juror was asked…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell Bros. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Black v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  3. Carusos v. Briarcliff Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Fountain v. McCallumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Renfroe v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. White v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. West Georgia Pulpwood & Timber Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Patillo v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Department of Transportation v. Delta MacHine Products Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API