Legal Opinion

Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1924No. 3650PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. To make a usage and custom of trade binding, it must be known, certain, uniform, reasonable, and not contrary to law. Berry v. Cooper, 28 Ga. 543 (3); 17 C. J. 452, note 48. An alleged usage, which leaves some material.element to the discretion of the individual is void for uncertainty. Such an usage would be void because useless. It would be like an automobile without gears. Wallace v. Morgan, 23 Ind. 399; Minis v. Nelson, 43 Fed. 777; Oelricks v. Ford, 64 U. S. 49, 62 (16 L. ed. 534). This is so for the reason that the office of a custom or usage is to interpret the otherwise…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Kennedy v. ManryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Morningstar v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Dorsey v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Silvertooth v. ShallenbergerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Guffin v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API