Legal Opinion

Imes v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1938No. 27845PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLESS, Y. C. J.

Chester Imes et al.' appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county in favor • of Globe Oil & Refining Company et al.

The owners of 21 lots in blocks 1 and :2 of J. W. Craig’s subdivision of Fruitland addition to Oklahoma City executed what is known as a community lease, and by October 28, 1931, Stauffer Petroleum Company was the owner and holder thereof. All of these lessors seemed to have executed this lease within a short space of time.

The original lease contains a- provision relating to the extension thereof to other and additional lots. The attempted exer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Probst v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Fletcher v. LyonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Henderson v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bowen v. Detroit City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. WickhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  2. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. HaslemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  3. Tiller v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Krug v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Texaco, Inc. v. LettermannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API