Legal Opinion
Probst v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 28, 1930No. 18962PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
Plaintiff in error, Geo. C. Probst, sued defendants in error, R. O. Jones, T. J. Hughes and Thomas N. Berry, for an accounting of one-sixteenth of the oil, gas, and casinghead gas produced from a certain leasehold accruing from a fixed time. The transactions giving rise to the suit were as follows:
On April 23, 1918, Julia C. Payne and I-I. H. Payne, fee owners, made an oil and gas lease on a certain tract of land to W. M. Williams for a term of five years and as long thereafter as oil or gas, or either of them, was produced from the leased premises by the lessee. Among other terms…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Clements v. CatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Phyfe v. Wardell & WoolleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Goocey v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Lonabaugh v. Midwest Refining Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1922
3Cited by46 opinions
- Sunac Petroleum Corporation v. ParkesTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Reynolds-Rexwinkle Oil, Inc. v. Petex, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Rees v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Krug v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Parker v. the Lewis Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.