Legal Opinion
Krug v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 10, 2013No. 106845PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
{1 Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (H & P) appeals a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, who are a class of oil and gas royalty owners. The jury returned verdicts on three alternative theories of recovery. The trial court judge granted judgment that included disgorgement of profits based on a sum the trial court found unjustly enriched H & P. On appeal, the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part, and remanded with instructions. We granted certiorari.
I. FACTS
2 The plaintiffs/appellees, H.B. Krug, Kathryn Krug, and Bobbie Ruth Eubanks, brought this class action against H & P. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Bill G. Isler v. Texas Oil & Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Probst v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- BERRY AND BERRY ACQUISITIONS v. BFN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- KRUG v. HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Strack v. Continental Resources, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.