Legal Opinion
In Re Late Fee and Over-Limit Fee Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 16, 2007No. C 07-0634 SBAPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Before the Court is the defendants’ 1 joint motion to dismiss [Docket No. 91] the plaintiffs’ 2 consolidated complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). After reading and considering the complaint and the arguments presented by the parties, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Crv. P. 78. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Background
The plaintiffs represent a putative class of “credit cardholders who have paid excessive late fees and/or…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Flash Memory Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Name.Space, Inc. v. Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & NumbersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- City of Moundridge v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- In Re Pressure Sensitive Labelstock Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In re Online Travel Co. (OTC) Hotel Booking Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.