Legal Opinion
In Re Pressure Sensitive Labelstock Antitrust Litigation
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 24, 2008No. MDL Docket No. 1556. No. 3:03-MDL-1556PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
THOMAS I. VANASKIE, District Judge.
On May 21, 2007, the Supreme Court decided Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, — U.S.-,-, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), in which it considered “what a plaintiff must plead in order to state a claim under § 1 of the Sherman Act.” 1 Relying on Twombly, Defendants Morgan Adhesives Company (“MACtae”), a producer of pressure sensitive labelstock (“PSL”), and Bemis Company, Inc. (“Bem-is”), the parent of MACtae, have moved to dismiss the claims asserted against them in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re Title Insurance Antitrust CasesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Standard Iron Works v. ArcelorMittalDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.