Legal Opinion
In Re Flash Memory Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 31, 2009No. Case C 07-0086 SBAPublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS DIRECT PURCHASER COMPLAINT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS INDIRECT PURCHASER COMPLAINT
Docket Nos. 370-374, 376, 379, 382, 454.
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
This consolidated antitrust class action arises from an alleged horizontal price fixing conspiracy between various manufacturers, sellers and distributors of flash memory. Flash memory is a type of electronic memory chip that has become commonplace in a variety of electronic products, such as USB drives, digital cameras, iPhones and similar…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- In Re Potash Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.