Legal Opinion
City of Moundridge v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 16, 2008No. Civil Action No. 04-940 (RWR)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Eighteen municipalities1 sued Exxon Mobil Corporation, BP America, Inc., and Cono-coPhillips Corporation for violating federal antitrust laws by agreeing to fix prices. The plaintiffs have moved for leave to amend the second supplemental complaint to add Shell Oil Company (“Shell”) as a defendant, to add five municipalities as plaintiffs,2 to clarify their allegation regarding the defendants’ control of natural gas production, and to delete unnecessary allegations. In response, the defendants moved for reconsideration of the January 9, 2007…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Iqbal v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Acosta Orellana v. CROPLIFE INTERN.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. GaubatzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McGee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.